Impressive Figures
36+
year of experience
80+
lawyers & experts
40+
countries registered
2000+
clients

Practices

Intellectual Property

24/7 intellectual property consulting services help you protect your brand safely and confidentially. Register with reputable intellectual property law firms to safeguard your company's intellectual assets.

Business Law

We provide comprehensive legal solutions covering the entire business lifecycle, from company establishment and internal corporate governance to commercial operations and effective dispute resolution.

Highlights

Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil” ➜
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil” ➜
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil” ➜
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil” ➜
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil” ➜
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Trademark Infringement Through Unauthorized Packaging - A Landmark Administrative Enforcement Case in Vietnam
22/09/2026 |

Trademark Infringement Through Unauthorized Packaging - A Landmark Administrative Enforcement Case in Vietnam

Xâm phạm quyền đối với nhãn hiệu thông qua việc sử dụng bao bì không được phép - Một vụ việc xử lý hành chính điển hình tại Việt Nam
Successful Opposition: Protection Refused for  LUCKY LUKE
05/06/2026 |

Successful Opposition: Protection Refused for LUCKY LUKE

Case summary: Copyright and Related Rights Infringement. Legal Grounds: Article 73.5 & Article 27.2.b, IP Law;  Point 39.12.a (iv) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN.
08/04/2026 |

Trademark Infringement Through Unauthorized Packaging - A Landmark Administrative Enforcement Case in Vietnam

Trademark law protects not only the visual sign itself but also the underlying system of quality control and the proprietor’s right of governance over that sign
Invalidation request against CCGrass trademark rejected
29/01/2026 |

Invalidation request against CCGrass trademark rejected

Grounds: Articles 72, 73, 74 and 96 of the IP Law 2005, amended and supplemented in 2009
Invalidation request to trademark “KAIWO” rejected
08/09/2025 |

Invalidation request to trademark “KAIWO” rejected

Industrial property rights to trade names shall be established on the basis of the lawful use of those trade names, and for those trade names the procedures for registration with the NOIP is not required. While exercising the rights to and upon the settlement of a dispute over a trade name, the entity owning that trade name shall evidence his/her/its rights with proofs indicating the period of time, territory and field in which the trade name has been used by that entity. (Point 1.6 of Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN)

Awards & Recommended

IP-Stars
asia-lawfirm2023
AsiaIP2024
WTR-1000
IAM1000

Customer feedback

Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!
Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!
Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!
Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!
Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!
Ecotek Canada
Mr. Nguyen Chau
Ecotek Canada Promotion Trade Corporation
We have successfully received the registration information. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Pham Intellectual Property Law Office for your professionalism and enthusiastic support. The work was handled more efficiently and quickly than we expected. Thank you very much!

About Pham & Associates

About Pham & Associates
Pham & Associates is a Vietnam-based intellectual property and commercial law firm with over three decades of experience supporting domestic and international clients. Since 1991, we have helped rights holders protect, manage, commercialize and enforce their intellectual property rights in Vietnam and abroad.

With offices in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang, our team comprises qualified lawyers, licensed industrial property representatives, senior intellectual property consultants and technical experts across various fields. We advise clients on patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights, trade secrets, enforcement, litigation, licensing, technology transfer and related commercial law matters.