Highlights
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”
Russian Law: IP Court and Rospatent Reach Different Conclusions on the Likelihood of Confusion Between “Trekrezan” and “Trekresil”
Although the Court overturned the initial decision, Rospatent maintained that the trademark “Trekrezan” is not confusingly similar to “Trekresil.”