Practice Highlights

The figurative trademark “GA NÒI, figure” was partially canceled

Grounds:  Clause 3, Article 220, IP Law; Point e, Clause 1, Article 6 and Clause 2, Article 29 of Decree 63/CP.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 15/12/2023

Applied-for mark  “DURAVIT, figure” is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 01/11/2023

Trademark Registration no.398747- “Platinum TE PASPALUM, figure”  proposed to be invalidated

Grounds: Article 74.2.(g,i),Article 96, the IP Law; Article 3, the Civil Code.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 27/09/2023

Provisional refusal of IRN1663951-BILLIONS requested to be reviewed

Grounds: Article 74.2( e), IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 18/09/2023

Applied-for mark  “Gen Y” is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 05/09/2023

Applied-for mark  “GU Clothes”  is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 30/08/2023

Applied-for mark  “Fase, ACOUSTICS”  is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 25/08/2023

Applied-for mark  “OSCAR KARAOKE, figure” is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 24/08/2023

Applied-for mark  “Rich CoCo, figure” is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 01/08/2023