Insights & Commentary
Applied-for mark “CÜB JÄPAN, Đỉnh của Chảo, hình” is being opposed
Grounds: Articles 73.5; 74.2(e,g,i); 90.2 and 112, the IP Law
Applied-for mark “GUBASIC” is being opposed
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark “SATA, figure” is being opposed
Grounds: Article 90.2 and 112, IP Law.
Applied-for mark " K YAKARA, hình " is being partially opposed.
Grounds: Art. 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark ““CALCIUM GREEN D3&K2-MK7 ME&BE, figure”” is being opposed
Grounds: Article 28 and 73.5 IP Law; Point 39.12.a(iv) Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN
Applied-for mark “PONDA TEA..., design of a panda bear” is being opposed
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.
Applied-for mark “PRADA” is being opposed
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark “FIZER” is opposed as filed in bad faith
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) IP Law; Article 3.3, the Civil Code
A request to invalidate the marks “Plus TPBANK, figure”, “FreeGo, figure” was rejected.
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), Article 96.1(b), IP Law; Article 17.1 Decree 103/2006/ND-CP