Practice Highlights

Proposal not to grant registration for mark “FaFa” was rejected.

Grounds: The proposal is considered unfounded

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 28/07/2022

Trademark “AERIUS” is proposed to be cancelled

Grounds: Articles 95.1(d), 95.4 and 95.5, the IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 19/07/2022

The mark "HD - GAS HOANG DONG" is invalidated

Grounds: Article 74.2(e); Article 96.1(b) and 96.3, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 12/07/2022

A request to invalidate the marks “Plus TPBANK, figure”, “FreeGo, figure” was rejected.

Grounds: Article 74.2(e), Article 96.1(b), IP Law; Article 17.1 Decree 103/2006/ND-CP

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 09/07/2022

A request to invalidate trademark “GW, figure” was rejected

Grounds: Articles 74.2.(a),(e) and 96.1(b), IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 06/07/2022

Applied-for mark  “EPIZODE”  is being opposed

Grounds: Article 74.2(g) và 90.2, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 05/07/2022

Applied-for mark  “PAXTOVID”  is being opposed

Grounds: Article 90.2 and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 01/07/2022

“AMERICAN LEGEND, figure” vs. “FORT LEGEND, figure”

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 29/06/2022

“COCO” vs. “LEETHI COCO, figure”

Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 29/06/2022