Publications & Updates

“CYZ” vs. “SYZ, figure”

Applied-for mark “CYZ” was rejected on the grounds that it’s confusingly similar to the cited trademark “SYZ, figure”...

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 26/08/2021

The IP Vietnam changed its domain name

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 09/08/2021

Notice of  time limits regarding application filing affected by Covid-19 Epidemic

On August 2, 2021, the IP Vietnam (NOIP) issued Notice No.7581/TB-SHTT on the time limits regarding application filing affected by the Covid-19 pandemic

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 04/08/2021

"ELIO" vs. “ELLIO” and “stylized ELIOS, figure”

The mark "ELIO" of Intl' Reg. no.1229748 was denied protection on the ground that it's confusingly similar to the cited marks "ELLIO” and “stylized ELIOS, figure”

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 03/08/2021

Seminar on the Detection and Investigation of IPR Infringements in Online and Physical Marketplaces

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 14/07/2021

IP Vietnam: Industrial property fee reduced by 50% from July 01 – December 31, 2021

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 09/07/2021

"MUHI" vs. “MUJI”, “MUJI, Japanese characters”

The mark "MUHI" of International application no.1027797, designating Vietnam, was temporarily denied protection on the grounds that it was confusingly similar to the cited marks “MUJI” and “MUJI, Japanese characters [mujirushi ryohin]”

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 09/06/2021

The mark “n03” is accepted for registration

The mark “n03” of International application no.1027797 designating Vietnam was temporarily rejected on the grounds that the mark consists of simple numerals, letters that are indistinctive.

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 04/06/2021

''PRESIDENT’S wax on'' vs. ''WAXONE 1''

Kim Vinh Phat filed an application at the NOIP for invalidation of the mark "PRESIDENT'S wax one" on the ground that the aforesaid  trademark is confusingly similar to the trademark "WAXONE 1".

#Corporate Law   #Foreign Investment
In-House Community 18/05/2021