Practice Highlights
Applied-for mark “SMARTSOIL” is being opposed
Grounds: Articles 74.2(e) và 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark “Smart Soil by AMVAC, figure” is being opposed
Grounds: Articles 74.2(e) và 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark “CUBINDO” is being opposed
Grounds: Articles 73.5; 74.2(e); 74.2(g); 74.2(i); 90(2) và 112, the IP Law
Applied-for mark “CUP THAILANA” is being opposed
Grounds: Articles 73.5; 74.2(e); 74.2(g); 74.2(i); 90(2) và 112, the IP Law
“DUCK, figure” vs. “HC DUCKY PRO”; “HC DUCKY SMART, HC DUCKY PRO BATHROOM, figure”...
Grounds: Art. 112 and Art. 74.2(e), IP Law
“JOY” vs. “REAL JOY, figure”
Ground: Art.74.2(e), IP Law
HOANG AN vs. 10ANG AN
Ground: Art.74.2(e), IP Law
Trademark case: "PHARMANEX" vs. "PHARMATEX"
Issue here regarding asessment of distinctiveness of word marks containing common prefixes for pharmaceutical products
